7th November 2008
Post-Election Open Letters: McCain

Next in my series of Post-Election Open Letters, which started with one to Barack Obama, I’d like to write to the opposition and express some things:

Dear Senator McCain,

Thank you for fighting a mostly admirable fight, despite all the mistakes your campaign made during the process and the huge anchor that is the Republican party right now tied around your neck.    I can only hope that I am as spry, intelligent, poignant, and energetic as you are when I’m your age.    It truly does show the power of wisdom and experience.

Some pointers for next time:

ONE: To really reconnect with the public on a Republican platform, you first have to get your party to go back to the days when GOP stood for “Grand Old Party” and not “Grumpy Old Pissants”.    Everyone has to be invited and welcomed, from the young to the old, and you have to tout the standard banners of the traditional Republican platform — minimal government, low taxes, less involvement, rights to the people and states.    The party has become far too clouded to be considered cohesive and folks have a tough time discerning it from the opposition, and when the Democrats have cookies, you’re just screwed.    The Republicans need to get their crap together because, lord knows, I usually love their traditional economic policy.

TWO: When choosing a running mate next time, please think it through more than you did.    The strategy to pick someone like Palin to garner the female vote was a big gamble and one that pissed off more women than won them over, I think.    Frankly, the populus is more intelligent than you give them credit for — do you really think that women will just roll over like that so easily?   Palin proved to be a moron of the worst kind — just enough information to make her dangerous, and not enough sense to shut up when required.    I think you knew this several weeks after making that ticket but, as they say, once you commit you can’t back out without looking wishy-washy.

THREE: The negativity?   I know you were grasping for straws near the end, but the truth is you hurt your campaign more than helped it with all those depressing ads, insinuations, and attacks.   As they say, sometimes small doses are the best way to take your medicine, and that approach might have worked better here.    People are smart — if you say once or twice that someone’s shifty, they’ll figure the rest out for themselves.    But if you hammer, hammer, HAMMER it into their skulls, they’re likely to think you’re either a) full of it or b) a bully.    I and many others found themselves being completely turned off by the constant barrage, and you never want that.

FOUR: We all appreciate the sacrifice you’ve given to our country in the form of military service and performance.   Nobody would ever deny that.    However, using that as a reason for why you’d be a good president is not a valid argument and harping on it does you no good.    A good soldier does not a good president make, and vice versa — you must prove yourself in other ways.    And you have — by being a long-time senator.   Except you voted with Bush too much, so…so much for that.   But the soldier bit?   Thank you.    Thank  you a hundred times.    But drop it for an election.

Finally, I’d like to thank you for running for the office.    It must have surely been a huge strain on you, your marriage, and your life in general.   Whether or not I agree with you, I cannot help but admire someone so dedicated to his country and service that he gives up a period of his life — when he really should be out fishing with his grandkids and playing cribbage — to go on the trail for public office.    Bless you for your energy, courage, and determination.

Hopefully you’ll stick around in the public sector for a long time yet; we can always use politicians with your fire and power.     Just give a bit of slack on the conservatism, hrm? :)

Sincerely yours,

Nathan Pralle


There are currently 5 responses to “Post-Election Open Letters: McCain”

  1. 1 On November 7th, 2008, Post-Election Open Letters: McCain said:

    [...] Post-Election Open Letters: McCain ONE: To really reconnect with the public on a Republican platform, you first have to get your party to go back to the days when GOP stood for “Grand Old Party” and not “Grumpy Old Pissants”. Everyone has to be invited and welcomed, … [...]

  2. 2 On November 7th, 2008, nicheplayerNo Gravatar UNITED STATES (75 comments) said:

    I should probably be more charitable to Senator McCain, but my feeling is that a politician of his experience should not have let himself be so obviously bullied by his managers. Seriously, does anyone really think he thought it was a good idea to choose Palin? Really? And if he DID, it only goes to show that maybe he was ill-suited for the Prez post after all.

    nicheplayers last blog post..Life with brother

  3. 3 On November 7th, 2008, Brock JohnsonNo Gravatar (2 comments) said:

    I agree completely with pointer number one. As for point two; if you think for a moment John McCain picked Palin personally then you’re far off base. Unfortunately the RNC and McCain’s advisors had far too much say in his campaign (pay no attention to the man behind the curtain). Personally, I don’t think there could have been a more transparent pick than Sarah Palin. She was picked because she is a woman and extremely conservative, so as to motivate the far right and pick up disgruntled Hillary supporters. Could go down as the worst VP pick ever. For number three, I agree the negativity only comes out when you’re getting desperate, and desperate he was. With number four, I strongly disagree. I never felt like they used his service as a reason why he would be a good president, rather proof of his never ending dedication to his country. Maybe now the Republican party will learn their true base is not with the socially conservative religious right. It’s time for an overhaul and a return to the principles you mention above.

  4. 4 On November 8th, 2008, CourtneyNo Gravatar (35 comments) said:

    Great letter.

    Palin was a huge mistake, but if he regrets that choice, he certainly hid it well. His concession speech was super classy - it’s too bad he couldn’t have run his whole campaign with the same grace and dignity.

    I lost all my respect for him (barring my respect for his military service) when he put women’s health in air-quotes. Because, apparently, us women-folk like to make up health issues so that we can have, goodygoody, late-term abortions. And our (air-quote) doctors (end air-quote) go along with us. Mmm-hmm.

    Courtneys last blog post..Contradictory

  5. 5 On November 8th, 2008, Nathan PralleNo Gravatar UNITED STATES (74 comments) said:

    Niche and Brock’s sentiment about McCain’s managers running him is probably spot-on, but still — if you can’t control your own managers, what makes you think you can control the country well? I guarantee the ‘management’ doesn’t get any easier. You’re still the answer for what happens, even if you didn’t effect the change, so to say that McCain wasn’t guilty of the Palin Pick is just passing the buck when the buck stops at him.

    Courtney: Agreed on both points. While I am vehemently anti-abortion myself, I cannot be anything but inflamed at his implication that all women are heartless bitches just aching to get rid of their babies as soon as possible. Sure, some are. Don’t get me wrong. But not most, and that’s a bad attitude to have if you’re trying hard to win over the female voters. Hell, it’s a bad attitude in general.

    Agreed on the classy speech…I was very impressed by it and I think others were, too. It proves he can be classy and suave when he tries, which bodes well should he ever get into something else in his career.

    Brock: While it never was explicitly said, “I was a good solider, therefore I’m a good president material”, it was implied over and over in commercials, stories, and other media. Older voters and military families often took a position of, “Well, he served his country in fighting, therefore he’ll be a good servant in office” which does NOT translate. That’s my admonition to lay off on that as one of your credentials for the office, as it’s just as tugging to the sympathetic yet unthinking masses as picking Palin to lure the religious right. Yes, it’s part of his record and yes, I respect it, but at the same time, it doesn’t even enter into my factors of whether or not he’s good for the office because I cannot see how its even relevant.

Leave a Reply

(I use CommentLuv!)

This site is using OpenAvatar based on
Related Posts: