I was pondering today the dilemma that actors and actresses face when it comes to a particular defining moment in their career — the decision to get nude. You hear about it all the time, who did what nude scene, how graphic it was, was it artful or just downright gratuitous, etc. Some people respect it, some criticize it. Some actors jaunt quickly down that road (assuming they are a good candidate for it; we’re all glad John Candy never bothered) and some consider it “below” them and will never sign on to a project that includes flashing some nip.
Personally, I think it has a lot to do with the art behind the shot — was it meant to simply twig someone in the audience or were you saying something with it? Did it fit the story or feel out of the fabric of the movie? Exploitation or enhancement?
For instance, Rachel McAdams in The Notebook was very tastefully done, and who doesn’t like a good makeout session in the rain and shagging like rabbits afterwards? Completely respectful, very much within the fabric of the story, excellent artistry. There weren’t any weird, lingering shots on the nakedness, it was just there as a part of the greater scene.
Kate Winslet in Titanic, however, is an example of a shot being done tastefully but not artfully as I felt it didn’t sit within the weft of the story at large. Sure, Rose is turning into a rebel girl thanks to her exposure to a common hobo but in an era of high necklines and erotic ankles, how likely is she to strip down and be drawn? I think most women of that era had sex with their clothes on anyway and medical emergencies involving genitalia and hoop skirts were common. A great scene (and a rack you’d be proud to hang on your wall) but unnecessary for the movie itself.
The German Oktoberfest girls in Beerfest who happened to conveniently have their shirts ripped off while involved in a fight during the infamous fall drinking holiday were simply there for the nudity and didn’t serve any audience but the men in the theatre. Not that I’m pooh-poohing it — after all, a beautiful chest is still a sight to behold in any context, but you notice that it wasn’t up for any Oscars for art production or…well, anything, really. We’re not too terribly upset about that.
The thing is, I don’t think it necessarily degrades an actress to bare her body to the camera provided she’s happy with how it went and doesn’t feel exploited. Serious moviefans will appreciate nudity for itself and not be critical of the person for pushing the envelope in the name of art. What do you think?
| posted in Movies |
1 Comment (Join the Fun!) |
| Related Posts: | |















